WriteHuman is a newer AI humanizer that's gaining traction. We tested both head-to-head against 8 AI detectors. Here's the honest comparison.
| Feature | Humaneer | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Detection bypass rate | 95%+ | 78% |
| Output readability | Natural | Decent |
| Meaning preservation | High | Medium |
| Starting price | $1 | $12/mo |
| Pay-as-you-go | ✗ |
Detection Test Results
Same methodology as all our comparisons — 20 identical ChatGPT texts processed through both tools:
Humaneer Results
- GPTZero: 19/20 passed ✓
- Turnitin: 18/20 passed ✓
- Originality.ai: 18/20 passed ✓
- Copyleaks: 19/20 passed ✓
WriteHuman Results
- GPTZero: 16/20 passed
- Turnitin: 14/20 passed
- Originality.ai: 13/20 passed
- Copyleaks: 15/20 passed
Output Quality
WriteHuman produces decent output but tends to over-paraphrase, sometimes changing the meaning:
“Coffee shops became the new office for a reason. There's something about background noise and the smell of espresso that makes your brain click into work mode. Science backs this up — moderate ambient noise boosts creative thinking.”
“Many people find that working in coffee shops enhances their productivity. The ambient environment, including background sounds and aromas, can stimulate cognitive function. Research suggests moderate noise levels may improve creative output.”
Pricing Comparison
Humaneer
From $1
Pay-as-you-go. No subscription. Credits never expire.
WriteHuman
$12/mo
Monthly subscription. Limited words on basic plan.
The Verdict
WriteHuman is a decent tool but falls short in both detection bypass rates and output naturalness. Humaneer produces more natural-sounding text, passes more detectors, and costs less. For the best results, try Humaneer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is WriteHuman better than QuillBot?
WriteHuman is specifically designed for AI detection bypass, while QuillBot is a general paraphraser. WriteHuman performs better at bypassing detectors, but neither matches Humaneer. See our QuillBot comparison.
Does WriteHuman work with academic papers?
WriteHuman can help with academic content but its over-paraphrasing tendency can change technical meanings. For academic use, Humaneer's meaning-preserving approach is safer.
© 2026 Humaneer. All rights reserved.